The hereditary privilege which the royals are ultimately born in to is no guarantee that the person in office is fit by birth to be head of state.To begin with one of the criticisms against the monarchy is that it is incredibly expensive. Many republicans emphasize that heritable monarchy is unjust and restricted.
Monarchists defends their position by arguing that an independent, symbolic head of government is a step detached from opinionated, money-making, and factional interests. Those against the monarch argue that the throne should be inherited by the eldest child even if it is a woman. Registered office: Venture House, Cross Street, Arnold, Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, NG5 7PJ. But this feudal system is now outdated and Britain needs change in order to revolutionalise the country and live in a more modern and democratic society. The crown can only be inherited by the eldest son and can only be given to the daughter if the monarch has no sons. Republicans against the system asserts that some of their expenses are done with a lot of secrecy and defies the freedom of information. A monarchy calls for respect especially the way the ordinary citizens are supposed to the royal. Political analysts assert that the head of state is more answerable and accountable to the people when elected, this result to a better country. Monarchists believe that a legitimate ruler with incomplete powers and unbiased personality can give a focus for national unity. Arguments against the monarchy. (Bagdanor, 2007, p 300) The monarchy has outlived its usefulness and because it symbolises deference and hierarchy, it forms a dominant barrier against any reform whether it be constitutional or social. (Barnett, 1994) The crown prerogative is exploited by ministers, and parliament cannot do anything to take away or reduce these powers as they have been derived from the royal prerogative. However, the roles and the position of a monarchy have changed with the development of the parliament and the law courts. As the head of state, she continues to have some symbolic powers though some roles have been taken by the parliament. However, officials hide the real nature of this truth by saying the queen “acts on the advice of the prime minister”, meaning she does what she is told. Its privilege authorities can be applied to get around standard democratic process with no responsibility.Owing to the history of Britain and in particular plots of catholic Jesuits against Protestantism, it is clear that Roman Catholics cannot inherit the crown. Arguments against the monarchy. They do not know the arguments in favour of a monarchy and against a republic. This brings us again to why the monarchy should be eradicated; she plays no political role for the UK and she gives the government enormous amount of political power which the government take full advantage of because they are not accountable to parliament. The political decisions are left to a political position of a prime minister. The discussion of the value of this institution, as with so many other of our institutions in this country, is just not taking place in some of our schools. Currently the civil list stands at £7.9 million a year and it is due for review in 2010, but parliament is unable to reduce the £7.9 million a year because of a 1972 Civil list Act which refuses any reductions to be made to the queen’s civil list. Republicans asserts that monarchy in the UK lacks significant independent responsibility and transparency in their governance.Analysts claim that monarchy system is very expensive to the citizens or the tax payers. Any other costs of the monarchy such as royal trips and the upkeep of royal castles are met by government departments through grants-in-aid from parliament. These include the fact that the monarchy is very costly, the monarch does not exercise formal powers herself, but it is exercised by ministers. According to republicans who oppose the monarchy, it is a primary right of the public to choose by ballot their head of government. (Republic, 2009) Politically the monarch serves little purpose. The civil list pays for the running of the royal household. It costs far too much for the royal family to live their lifestyle. And … The queen is powerless and pointless and all her powers are invested in the prime minister. There are some powers which she can and has used, in occasions when there is a hung parliament.
This results to other ethnic groups being deprived of a head of government which they can associate to. The system promotes attitudes which support a past age of imperialism not practical for a modern state.
Monarchy undervalues a parliamentary system of government.
They argue that it is impossible for politicians to misuse the constitutional power for their personal achievements.Philosophers assert that monarchy gives a central point for unity and tradition.